Stuart Hall, Jamaica’s youngest cultural and social sciences student, born in 1964 as a social sciences student at the University of Birmingham, invites reflection on his leading exponent in cultural studies.

Hall is one of the critics of the British economy. On Studio Park, he focuses on issues of race, sexuality, identity and grandiose means. We explore the politics of black subjectivity with young artists and filmmakers. Since then, a new reverberation has emerged in discussions in galleries across the UK and Europe today.

He was accompanied by Stuart Hall, Spandilus and Catherine Walsh, lecturers in the doctoral program at the Andina Simón Bolívar Institute of Latin American Culture, and Santiago Arboleda .

It was discussed by the founders of the new British government, as well as by the International Review and the New Left Review. I see the position of my critics as analytical political analysts, as they may also be activists against neoliberalism, Thatcherism and all conservative processes, Britain, the European world and world conservative education.

Reconocemos a Stuart as the father of research culture, algunas personas le llaman el padre de las ciencias Sociales, más que todo por su posiciónamiento; you should read political issues, the theory is wrong again, one of the actuaries of XX is now in the sealed day XXI . Stuart’s legacy is increasingly seen in Latin America and elsewhere in the world as a statesman, an intellectual, an uncompromising man, combined with a vision of radical change that had the potential to change simultaneously The world and its work are thus visible, and you think intellectuals and scholars and politicians are very important to them.

Say our Portuguese told you we met Stuart Hall?

SA: I think one of Stuart Hall’s important legacies is his contribution to difference; these differences were crucial to informing the public about the idea of ​​the return of the nation in recent years, but were insignificant to the idea of ​​the invention of the new city-state. . Stuart Hall insists that he seeks these situational distinctions, but Stuart Hall’s legacy also does not allow him access to the strategic political moments that are so important to Hall’s insistence on finding political moments on the horizon of future prospects. Seen in this way, the idea of ​​cultural studios is an interdisciplinary contribution, and one that is not yet settled, and it is itself a conclusion that I have come to at a very critical moment in a debate about topics that feel the tone has only recently been highly discussed. What is important is to recognize the holistic and complete way of thinking, and fundamentally insist on clarifying differences to improve the possibility of balance and equality, as well as political and practical positions, and build new possibilities for the future. Together, that is, near me.

Now, from my specific area of ​​research, Stuart Hall is crucial to understanding the legacy of the African American diaspora and the African diaspora as a whole. They were the most influenced by foreign construction, founded by the African diaspora who fought against racism, because they were completely nocivo before the possibility of building conventions for the public to find new options and the new democracy questioning the options. I’m sure Stuart Hall has carried on a lot of his legacy in politics and politics because he’s relevant now.

CW: I thought of Santiago, and I included him as Stewart did 50 years ago when I began a cultural studies project on racism and racism as part of a core debate. During this period he engaged with popular educators in the grassroots community such as Raymond Williams and Richard Hoggart, and we were able to see the first foundations emerge from what I now call the Cultural Studio. Stewart had a political stance at this time because he said cultural studies was not a discipline nor an academic state because it was a political project that could be done in co